LAST RANT OF THE DAY I PROMISE!! lol

Audio evidence.

why is it that even when audio evidence is plain as day, there are people who will hear something COMPLETELY opposite of what is being said? I know the mind can play tricks on hearing and you can and will matrix some sounds out there into something else, I am though under the assumption that everyone knows basic english? sounds and pronunciations that we have all heard since we started to talk, yet there are people out there who if a clear as day voice on a recording said "I'M OVER HERE" they would make out "TWO IN THE CLEAR" ?????? Of course that is not a real case scenario at the moment, it's to prove a point.
I have worked in audio for over the past 15 years of my life, I have distinquished different sounds and pronunciations and have a mental database of what sounds are and can either reproduce them or find logical explantions for them, hence my specialty in this group. I am usually the first person to debunk audio and rarely am I one to claim I have audio as evidence unless it is clear as day and can but understood and not accounted for in the form of another person in the place. In a nutshell I'm a hard person to get and EVP past without scrutiny, So when I do hear something, 99% of the time I give it the stamp of approval, it is paranormal.

I guess i'm getting sick of the so called "experts" I have been finding left and right, whats even worse are the "orb chasers" who I have classified as a person or group of people who claim anything and everything to be paranormal right down to what they ate for breakfast. Most of the time they have audio of themselves talking on the phone and claim it is ghostly, or they have a video (cough cough) of a guy swatting a bug while laying down and then seeing the bug fly away and calling it a paranormal anomoly... yea, it's paranormal that the mosquito wasn't smarter than the people calling it a ghost!

I can't wait till I get all my thoughts together and write a book.